Your elderly client calls you and asks you to wire $20,000 to a non-family member. When you ask what the payment is for, he gives vague answers or gets defensive. Or you are preparing a long-time client’s taxes and it appears that she is taking much larger than normal distributions. What do you do? Do you simply follow your client’s direction or do you investigate further?
There are no easy answers especially since you know that if you push too hard you may lose the client, which means they are likely to become even more vulnerable to exploitation.
Stay tuned for educational programming by the Norris McLaughlin Elder Care & Special Needs Law Practice Group to help prepare you to address this growing problem. If you have any questions about this post or any other related matters, please feel free to email me at ssiegel@norris-law.com.
[1] FINRA Rule 2165 provides a safe harbor for broker-dealers to place a temporary hold on a disbursement of funds or securities from a client’s account if the broker reasonably believes that financial exploitation has occurred, is occurring, has been attempted or will be attempted.
[2] Twenty-six states have enacted financial exploitation rules but New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania are not on the forefront on these issues. They each allow permissive reporting but have not adopted comprehensive legislation to protect vulnerable adults. See N.J. Stat. § 52:27D-407, N.J. Stat. § 52:27D-409(a)(2); 6 P.A. Code § 15.2 and 15.21; 35 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 10225.103 and .302; 35 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 10210.103 and .302; and N.Y. Soc. Serv. Law § 473-b(a). However, broker-dealers are subject to obligations under federal law.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more