logo
logo
logo
MENU
Categories
Hospitals and Health Systems - Audits and ReimbursementHospitals and Health Systems - Consent and TreatmentHospitals and Health Systems - Corporate and GovernanceHospitals and Health Systems - Corporate ComplianceHospitals and Health Systems - Fraud and AbuseHospitals and Health Systems - Government InvestigationsHospitals and Health Systems - Health RecordsHospitals and Health Systems - HIPAA and HITECHHospitals and Health Systems - Managed CareHospitals and Health Systems - Medical Staff IssuesHospitals and Health Systems - Medical Training ProgramsHospitals and Health Systems - MedicareHospitals and Health Systems - Mergers, Affiliations and Joint VenturesHospitals and Health Systems - Peer ReviewHospitals and Health Systems - Professional Services AgreementsMedical SocietiesPharmaceutical Industry - Agreements with PhysiciansPharmaceutical Industry - Clinical ResearchPharmaceutical Industry - Regulatory CompliancePhysicians and Providers - Audits and ReimbursementPhysicians and Providers - CertificationsPhysicians and Providers - CredentialingPhysicians and Providers - Disciplinary ActionsPhysicians and Providers - Employment AgreementsPhysicians and Providers - Fraud and AbusePhysicians and Providers - Government InvestigationsPhysicians and Providers - HIPAA and PrivacyPhysicians and Providers - ImpairmentPhysicians and Providers - LicensingPhysicians and Providers - LitigationPhysicians and Providers - MedicarePhysicians and Providers - Peer ReviewPhysicians and Providers - Practice AcquisitionsPhysicians and Providers - Practice IssuesPhysicians and Providers - Regulatory CompliancePhysicians and Providers - SupervisionPhysicians and Providers - TrainingUncategorized
F. Peter Lehr
Member
F. Peter Lehr
Visit Profile

Billing Pennsylvania Medicaid for Nursing Facility Residents’ Medicare Part B Copays Ruled as Impermissible Balance Billing

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has upheld an order of the Department of Human Services (“DHS”) disallowing a nursing facility’s practice of billing Medicaid for Medicare cost-sharing amounts of dual eligible (Medicare and Medicaid) residents.  See Mulberry Square Elder Care v. D.H.S., No. 371 C.D. 2017 (Decided:  July 26, 2018).  The Court found that by representing Medicare Part B copays as costs incurred, the nursing facility held residents legally liable for their payment without collecting the amount, and therefore, engaged in prohibited balance billing.

At issue was a billing practice instituted by a nursing facility by which it attempted to recoup unpaid Medicare Part B copays of its residents by deducting the amount of the copays from the patient liability amounts, as it is permitted to do in certain circumstances for “other medical expenses” (i.e., the costs of medical goods or services incurred during that month).  Then, the nursing facility billed Medicaid for the Part B copays as “other medical expenses” in order to offset the amount subtracted from the patient liability.  In so doing, the facility sought and was paid more than the maximum Medicaid fee for the service. Under federal and state law, Medicaid is prohibited from paying Medicare cost-sharing amounts, such as copays, when the Medicare payment for the service exceeds the Medicaid payment.

As part of a billing audit, DHS disallowed the facility’s billing practice based on incorrect patient liability amounts, and for billing Medicare Part B copays as “other medical expenses.”  On appeal, the facility argued DHS had no basis for taking such action as it did not promulgate a regulation prohibiting the billing practice.  DHS countered by noting that the billing practice directly violated federal and state law.  It also asserted that by holding residents liable for the copays by deducting the amount from their patient liability and billing them as “other medical expenses,” the facility engaged in prohibited balance billing.  Balance billing involves holding patients liable for charges that remain unpaid by Medicare or Medicaid.  The Court ruled in favor of DHS’ position and found that the facility engaged in impermissible balance billing, even though it only billed, and did not collect, amounts from residents.

The Commonwealth Court’s decision in Mulberry serves to remind nursing facilities and other providers to be compliant in holding enrollees of the Medicare program responsible for any cost-sharing amounts, such as copays, and to be mindful of the general prohibition on balance billing.

If you have any questions about this post or any related matters, please contact me at plehr@norris-law.com.

Share
Related Posts
Coronavirus Alert: Historic Expansion of Telehealth in Response to COVID-19 Crisis
OIG to Waive Sanctions for Providers’ Waiver of Telehealth Cost-Sharing Amounts During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency
Medicare Revocation of Enrollment – CMS Continues to Needlessly Punish Physicians
F. Peter Lehr
Member
F. Peter Lehr
Visit Profile
Related Posts
Coronavirus Alert: Historic Expansion of Telehealth in Response to COVID-19 Crisis
OIG to Waive Sanctions for Providers’ Waiver of Telehealth Cost-Sharing Amounts During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency
Medicare Revocation of Enrollment – CMS Continues to Needlessly Punish Physicians
Share
Join our growing team
We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.
Subscribe to our content
Receive timely legal information
delivered to your inbox
Subscribe to our content
Receive timely legal information
delivered to your inbox
© 2022, Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Meritas

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more