logo
logo
logo
MENU
Categories
Hospitals and Health Systems - Audits and ReimbursementHospitals and Health Systems - Consent and TreatmentHospitals and Health Systems - Corporate and GovernanceHospitals and Health Systems - Corporate ComplianceHospitals and Health Systems - Fraud and AbuseHospitals and Health Systems - Government InvestigationsHospitals and Health Systems - Health RecordsHospitals and Health Systems - HIPAA and HITECHHospitals and Health Systems - Managed CareHospitals and Health Systems - Medical Staff IssuesHospitals and Health Systems - Medical Training ProgramsHospitals and Health Systems - MedicareHospitals and Health Systems - Mergers, Affiliations and Joint VenturesHospitals and Health Systems - Peer ReviewHospitals and Health Systems - Professional Services AgreementsMedical SocietiesPharmaceutical Industry - Agreements with PhysiciansPharmaceutical Industry - Clinical ResearchPharmaceutical Industry - Regulatory CompliancePhysicians and Providers - Audits and ReimbursementPhysicians and Providers - CertificationsPhysicians and Providers - CredentialingPhysicians and Providers - Disciplinary ActionsPhysicians and Providers - Employment AgreementsPhysicians and Providers - Fraud and AbusePhysicians and Providers - Government InvestigationsPhysicians and Providers - HIPAA and PrivacyPhysicians and Providers - ImpairmentPhysicians and Providers - LicensingPhysicians and Providers - LitigationPhysicians and Providers - MedicarePhysicians and Providers - Peer ReviewPhysicians and Providers - Practice AcquisitionsPhysicians and Providers - Practice IssuesPhysicians and Providers - Regulatory CompliancePhysicians and Providers - SupervisionPhysicians and Providers - TrainingUncategorized
Sandra Jarva Weiss
Member
Sandra Jarva Weiss
Visit Profile

CMS’s Growing Interest in Value-Based Payments

Payment for Medical Doctor through CMS Medicare and Medicaid Services

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is increasing its efforts to transform Medicare from a fee-for-service payment system to a payment system that pays based on the value, quality, and outcome of the services provided.

Background

In 2015 and 2016, the CMS implemented several mandatory episode-based payment models for joint replacement, cardiac rehab, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, and surgical hip/femur fracture. Under the episode-based payment model, payment for all care related to the specific condition provided within 90 days of hospital discharge was included in the episode of care payment. The CMS noted that it believed these models would further the goals of improving efficiency and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries receiving care for these common clinical conditions and procedures.

In 2017, with a change in administration, the CMS rescinded most of the mandatory episode-based payment models and allowed certain hospitals to opt-out of participation in the joint replacement model, leading many to speculate that there would be no further expansion of mandatory bundled payment models in the Trump administration. However, in 2019, the CMS proposed a radiation oncology episode-based payment model that, if finalized, may lead to further episode-based models for other common conditions/procedures or the re-introduction of some of the 2015/2016 models.

Medicare and Medicaid Services

Previous value-based payment models have generally involved the CMS sharing gains with providers but allowing providers to limit their share in losses. Increasingly, the CMS now appears to be designing payment models that will require providers to bear downside risk along with gains. The CMS has also finalized revisions to the Medicare Shared Savings Program that require accountable care organizations to repay the CMS a portion of any shared losses beginning in the third year of participation. In addition, the CMS has begun adding voluntary primary care value-based payment models.

In 2019, the CMS proposed exceptions to the physician self-referral law for certain value-based arrangements between or among providers that include full financial risk arrangements and meaningful downside financial risk to physicians. Though not finalized, these proposed rules would suggest that the CMS is promoting value-based payments on multiple fronts.

Conclusion

All of these recent developments signal a trend by the CMS to restart the initiatives that began in 2015 to move from fee-for-service to value-based payment for services. The year ahead should prove instructive as to whether these initiatives, if finalized, will result in a significant and lasting shift to value-based payment models.

If you have any questions about this post or related matters, please contact me at sjarvaweiss@norris-law.com.
Share
Related Posts
Medicare Revocation of Enrollment – CMS Continues to Needlessly Punish Physicians
Sandra Jarva Weiss
Member
Sandra Jarva Weiss
Visit Profile
Related Posts
Medicare Revocation of Enrollment – CMS Continues to Needlessly Punish Physicians
Share
Join our growing team
We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.
Subscribe to our content
Receive timely legal information
delivered to your inbox
Subscribe to our content
Receive timely legal information
delivered to your inbox
© 2022, Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Meritas

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more