• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Departures Discrimination Employment Law Employment Terminations/Resignations Freelance FTC Independent Contractors Non-compete Agreements Overtime Religious Accommodations Remote Work Salary Severance Small Business Uncategorized
    Blogs > The Employment Strategists > Employers Face Difficult Choices as...
    Member
    Mariya Gonor
    Visit Profile

    Employers Face Difficult Choices as Court Strikes Down Biden Administration Overtime Rule

    Employers Face Difficult Choices as Court Strikes Down Biden Administration Overtime Rule

    The Biden administration’s Department of Labor (DOL) overtime rule, enacted on April 23, 2024, and set to increase salary thresholds for overtime exemptions, has been struck down. A Texas federal court’s ruling on Nov. 17, 2024, leaves employers facing uncertainty and difficult choices.

    What Was the Overtime Rule?

    The rule increased the salary threshold for overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from $35,568 to $43,888 in July 2024, with a second increase to $58,656 planned for January 2025. These changes aimed to expand overtime protections for more workers.

    However, U.S. District Judge Sean Jordan found that the DOL overstepped its authority. His decision nullifies the rule, reverting the salary threshold to $35,568, as set during the Trump administration. In his ruling, Judge Jordan emphasized the importance of ensuring consistent relief:

    “Unlike at the preliminary-injunction stage when the Court had broad discretion to fashion appropriate preliminary relief, the Fifth Circuit has made clear that district courts should generally ‘nullify and revoke’ illegal agency action.”

    Implications for Employers

    With the rule struck down, employers must reassess payroll and operational policies developed in response to the changes. Here’s what the decision means:

    1. Reverting Salary Adjustments: Employers who increased employee salaries to comply with the $43,888 threshold may consider reverting to previous pay levels. However, these decisions must account for state laws and any contractual obligations.
    2. Reevaluating Scheduling and Overtime Policies: Some employers may need to modify scheduling or overtime policies introduced under the rule, potentially returning to pre-rule practices.

    Risks of Rolling Back Changes

    Reverting salary increases or adjusting policies carries significant risks:

    • Employee Morale and Retention: Pay reductions may harm morale and lead to turnover.
    • Legal Exposure: Employers could face lawsuits if salary adjustments violate contracts or state-specific wage laws.

    A Complex Regulatory Landscape

    The ruling effectively reduces overtime eligibility, rolling back protections for many workers. Advocacy groups warn this may lead to longer work hours without additional compensation for low-income employees. Employers are advised to proceed cautiously, keeping the following considerations in mind:

    • Compliance: Ensure adjustments align with federal, state, and local laws.
    • Employee Relations: Weigh the cultural and retention impacts of salary or policy changes.
    • Legal Guidance: Consult with legal counsel to navigate this complex landscape and minimize risks.

    Key Takeaways for Employers

    1. The salary threshold for overtime reverts to $35,568, undoing the July increase to $43,888 and halting the planned January 2025 increase to $58,656.
    2. Employers considering salary adjustments must weigh operational and legal risks, including employee morale and retention concerns.
    3. Legal consultation is critical to ensure compliance and avoid pitfalls.

    Navigating the fallout may include difficult choices for employers. For tailored advice or to continue the conversation, reach out to our team at TheEmploymentStrategists@norris-law.com. In the meantime, stay tuned for more employment law developments through our blog and podcast.

    About the Authors – The Employment Strategists

    David T. Harmon, Co-Chair of the firm’s Executive Compensation and Employment Strategies Group with Mariya Gonor, focuses on employment law with a concentration on executive compensation, workplace agreements, and compliance strategies. He represents individuals and companies in matters involving employment discrimination, wrongful termination, sexual harassment, retaliation, and statutory violations.

    David provides strategic counsel to senior-level employees and employers, negotiating employment and severance agreements, non-compete clauses, equity plans, and confidentiality agreements. He also assists employers with HR compliance programs, employee policy manuals, and workplace training while offering neutral investigations and strategic solutions to employment challenges.

    A recognized authority on employment law, David is frequently quoted in leading publications and co-hosts The Employment Strategists blog and podcast with Mariya, offering insights into navigating the complexities of workplace relationships.

    Mariya Gonor, Co-Chair of the firm’s Executive Compensation and Employment Strategies Group with David Harmon, focuses her practice on labor and employment law as well as complex commercial litigation. She provides counsel on workplace issues, including claims involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wage and hour violations under state and federal laws such as NJLAD, CEPA, and the New York Human Rights Law. Mariya has conducted corporate investigations into allegations of harassment and discrimination, offering clients guidance to navigate sensitive employment matters

    An advocate for pro bono work, Mariya has represented victims of domestic violence and served as corporate counsel for nonprofit organizations. Fluent in Ukrainian and Russian, she is a New Jersey Court Certified Mediator.

    Member
    Mariya Gonor
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    New Jersey Adopts ABC Test Regulations: What Employers Should Know About Independent Contractor Classification New Executive Order Targets Workplace Discrimination Law: Major Shift Away from Disparate Impact Liability Trump Declared English the Official Language. Can Employers Do The Same?

    Share

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more