MENU Close
Close
  • Home
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Resources
  • News & Events
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Join our Team
Search
Back
    Quick Links:
    Join Webinar
    Read News
    Our Location
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCriminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation, Employment, ERISA, and Employee Benefits
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media LawMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • About Us
    • Delivering Value
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Meritas

    New Jersey

    400 Crossing Boulevard
    8th Floor
    Bridgewater, NJ 08807
    Phone:(908) 722-0700
    Fax:(908) 722-0755

    28 Valley Road
    Suite 1
    Montclair, NJ 07042

    New York

    7 Times Square
    21st Floor
    New York City, NY 10036
    Phone:(212) 808-0700
    Fax:(212) 808-0844

    Pennsylvania

    515 West Hamilton Street
    Suite 502
    Allentown, PA 18101
    Phone:(610) 391-1800
    Fax:(610) 391-1805

    • What sets us apart
    • Attorneys
    • Other Professionals
    • Professional Development
    • Non-Discrimination Policy

    Categories

    Hospitals and Health Systems - Audits and Reimbursement Hospitals and Health Systems - Consent and Treatment Hospitals and Health Systems - Corporate and Governance Hospitals and Health Systems - Corporate Compliance Hospitals and Health Systems - Fraud and Abuse Hospitals and Health Systems - Government Investigations Hospitals and Health Systems - Health Records Hospitals and Health Systems - HIPAA and HITECH Hospitals and Health Systems - Managed Care Hospitals and Health Systems - Medical Staff Issues Hospitals and Health Systems - Medical Training Programs Hospitals and Health Systems - Medicare Hospitals and Health Systems - Mergers, Affiliations and Joint Ventures Hospitals and Health Systems - Peer Review Hospitals and Health Systems - Professional Services Agreements Pharmaceutical Industry - Agreements with Physicians Pharmaceutical Industry - Regulatory Compliance Physicians and Providers - Audits and Reimbursement Physicians and Providers - Certifications Physicians and Providers - Credentialing Physicians and Providers - Disciplinary Actions Physicians and Providers - Employment Agreements Physicians and Providers - Fraud and Abuse Physicians and Providers - Government Investigations Physicians and Providers - HIPAA and Privacy Physicians and Providers - Impairment Physicians and Providers - Licensing Physicians and Providers - Litigation Physicians and Providers - Medicare Physicians and Providers - Peer Review Physicians and Providers - Practice Acquisitions Physicians and Providers - Practice Issues Physicians and Providers - Regulatory Compliance Physicians and Providers - Supervision Physicians and Providers - Training Uncategorized
    Blogs > The Legal Diagnosis > CMS Issues Proposed Rule on...
    Member
    Sandra Jarva Weiss
    Visit Profile

    CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stark Law Advisory Opinions

    CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stark Law Advisory Opinions

    On July 29, 2019 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") issued a proposed rule on modifications to the Stark Law advisory opinion regulations.  The proposed rule responds to comments CMS received in response to its July 25, 2018 Request for Information, seeking recommendations from the public on how CMS might address any undue impact and burden of the Stark Law.

    CMS noted that there are important differences between the Stark Law, a strict liability statute designed to prevent payment for services where referrals are affected by financial conflicts of interest, and the Anti-Kickback Statute, a criminal law designed to prosecute intentional acts of fraud and abuse.  The safe harbors under the Anti-Kickback Statute are voluntary, and failure of an arrangement to satisfy the safe harbor requirements does not mean the arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute.  By contrast, the Stark Law prohibits a physician’s referral if the financial relationship involving the physician does not satisfy the requirements of a specific Stark Law exception, regardless of the parties’ intent.  Under the Stark Law, parties that act in good faith may nonetheless face significant financial exposure if they misunderstand or misapply the Stark Law’s exceptions.

    CMS noted that despite the complexity of the Stark Law, the provider’s financial exposure, and the strict liability nature of the Stark Law, it has issued only 30 advisory opinions in the more than 20 years since the advisory opinion process went into effect in 1998.  In an effort to make the advisory opinion process more accessible and produce more meaningful opinions, CMS proposed the following changes:

    1. Broaden Scope of Advisory Opinions – Currently CMS accepts advisory opinion requests that involve arrangements that already exist and arrangements that a requestor certifies that they plan to enter. CMS currently does not accept hypothetical fact patterns or general questions of interpretation, and is concerned that doing so could overwhelm the agency with advisory opinion requests.  However, CMS is seeking further comments on whether it should expand the scope to cover hypothetical fact patterns or questions of interpretation.  CMS noted the CMS Physician Self-Referral Call Center and its publishing of frequently asked questions serve as alternative resources for answers to hypothetical arrangements.

    Currently, too, CMS will not issue an advisory opinion if the request involves conduct that is the subject of an investigation or other governmental proceeding.  CMS proposes to ease this restriction to allow CMS discretion, in consultation with the OIG and DOJ, on whether it would be appropriate to accept the advisory opinion request or issue an advisory opinion in such circumstances.

    CMS has further proposed that it would be able to reject an advisory opinion request if the request did not describe the arrangement with a level of detail sufficient for CMS to issue an opinion and the requestor does not timely respond to CMS’ requests for additional information.

    1. Shorten Timeline for Issuing Advisory Opinions – CMS has proposed shortening the 90-day timeframe for most advisory opinions to 60 days. The 60 days would begin on the date CMS formally accepts the advisory opinion request and would be tolled during any time periods when the request, is being revised or additional information is being provided.  CMS is also considering whether to provide an expedited review and is seeking comments on the parameters for such review.
    2. Ease Certification Requirements – Currently CMS requires that if the requestor is a corporation, the certification must be signed by the CEO or comparable officer. The certification requirement relates to the accuracy of the information and the requestor’s intention to enter into any proposed arrangement.  CMS proposes to ease this requirement to allow the certification to be signed by an officer authorized to act on behalf of the requestor, or to eliminate the certification requirement entirely.  CMS is seeking comment on whether the certification requirement is necessary.
    3. Revise Fees for Advisory Opinions – Currently CMS charges an initial fee of $250 plus any additional costs exceeding the $250 allowing the requestor to designate a triggering cap once the costs reach such cap. CMS is proposing to eliminate the $250 initial fee and charge $220 per hour for preparation of an advisory opinion ($440 per hour for expedited requests) along with a cap on the amount of fees charged.  CMS is seeking comments on these proposals.
    4. Allow Third Parties to Rely on Advisory Opinions – CMS has taken the view that only the requestor may rely on an advisory opinion. CMS now proposes to expand this to allow any individuals or entities who are parties to the arrangement (but not specific requestors) to rely upon the advisory opinion.  For example, in an advisory opinion addressing an arrangement between a hospital and a referring physician, both the hospital and the physician may rely on the advisory opinion, even if only the hospital, and not the physician, was a requestor.

    CMS further proposes not to pursue sanctions against individuals or entities that are parties to an arrangement that CMS determines is indistinguishable in all material aspects from another arrangement that was the subject of an advisory opinion.

    CMS also proposes that individuals and entities may reasonably rely on an advisory opinion as non-binding guidance that illustrates the application of the Stark Law to specific facts and circumstances.

    1. Recession of Advisory Opinions – CMS is seeking comments on limiting its right to rescind an advisory opinion only when there is a material regulatory change that impacts the conclusions reached, or when a party has received a negative advisory opinion and wishes to have CMS reconsider the request in light of new facts or law.

    Please contact me at sjarvaweiss@norris-law.com, if you have questions concerning this proposed rule or would like assistance submitting comments to the proposed rule, which must be filed by September 27, 2019.

    Member
    Sandra Jarva Weiss
    Visit Profile

    Share

    Tags

    #CMS rules #healthcare law #Stark Law

    Similar Posts

    September 21, 2023
    A Warning to Physicians: Understanding the Authority of the New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct Over Your Practice
    A Warning to Physicians: Understanding the Authority of the New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct Over Your Practice
    July 27, 2021
    Appealing NPDB Reports
    Appealing NPDB Reports
    June 11, 2021
    OSHA Issues COVID-19 Safety Rule: Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS)
    OSHA Issues COVID-19 Safety Rule: Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS)

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more