• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCriminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Hospitals and Health Systems - Audits and Reimbursement Hospitals and Health Systems - Consent and Treatment Hospitals and Health Systems - Consent and Treatment|Hospitals and Health Systems - Corporate and Governance|Pharmaceutical Industry - Agreements with Physicians Hospitals and Health Systems - Corporate and Governance Hospitals and Health Systems - Corporate Compliance Hospitals and Health Systems - Fraud and Abuse Hospitals and Health Systems - Government Investigations Hospitals and Health Systems - Health Records Hospitals and Health Systems - HIPAA and HITECH Hospitals and Health Systems - Managed Care Hospitals and Health Systems - Medical Staff Issues Hospitals and Health Systems - Medical Training Programs Hospitals and Health Systems - Medicare Hospitals and Health Systems - Mergers, Affiliations and Joint Ventures Hospitals and Health Systems - Peer Review Hospitals and Health Systems - Professional Services Agreements Pharmaceutical Industry - Agreements with Physicians Pharmaceutical Industry - Regulatory Compliance Physicians and Providers - Audits and Reimbursement Physicians and Providers - Certifications Physicians and Providers - Credentialing Physicians and Providers - Disciplinary Actions Physicians and Providers - Employment Agreements Physicians and Providers - Fraud and Abuse Physicians and Providers - Government Investigations Physicians and Providers - HIPAA and Privacy Physicians and Providers - Impairment Physicians and Providers - Licensing Physicians and Providers - Litigation Physicians and Providers - Medicare Physicians and Providers - Peer Review Physicians and Providers - Practice Acquisitions Physicians and Providers - Practice Issues Physicians and Providers - Regulatory Compliance Physicians and Providers - Supervision Physicians and Providers - Training Uncategorized
    Blogs > The Legal Diagnosis > Pennsylvania Enacts New Law Banning...
    Associate
    Sophia B. Villani
    Visit Profile

    Pennsylvania Enacts New Law Banning Non-Compete Agreements for Health Care Practitioners

    Pennsylvania Enacts New Law Banning Non-Compete Agreements for Health Care Practitioners

    Noncompete agreements have come under attack at both the federal and state level. Attention has been focused on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) final rule Non-Compete Clause Final Rule prohibiting non-compete agreements (“Final Rule”), which takes effect Sept. 4, 2024. The Final Rule contains several exceptions to the noncompete ban, including for nonprofit companies (such as hospital networks). But some states, such as Pennsylvania, are taking steps to extend the noncompete prohibitions and restrictions to the healthcare industry, including to nonprofit health care organizations that are exempt from the FTC Final Rule.

    On July 17, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro signed into law House Bill No. 1633, referred to as the “Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act” (the “Act”), which prohibits the enforcement of noncompete covenants entered into between health care practitioners and employers. The Act is the first law in Pennsylvania to limit noncompete agreements in the Pennsylvania health care industry.

    In the health care context, the Act states that noncompete covenants “inhibit competition that benefits employees and patients and can deter needed health care practitioners from wanting to practice in Pennsylvania.” Pursuant to the Act, a “noncompete covenant” is “an agreement entered into between an employer and a health care practitioner in [Pennsylvania] which has the effect of impeding the ability of the health care practitioner to continue treating patients or accepting new patients, either practicing independently or in the employment of a competing employer, after the term of employment.” The Act applies only to health care practitioners, defined to include only licensed physicians (“MD”/“DO”), certified registered nurse anesthetists (“CRNA”), certified registered nurse practitioners (“CRNP”), and physician assistants (“PA”).

    The Act takes effect on Jan. 1, 2025 (“Effective Date”) and renders noncompete covenants entered into after the Effective Date void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.  Any noncompete covenant entered into prior to the Effective Date would not be subject to the Act. Additionally, the Act provides an exception to allow employers to enforce a noncompete covenant if the duration of the noncompete is no more than 1 year, and the health care practitioner voluntarily terminated employment and was not dismissed by the employer. A noncompete covenant is not enforceable if the employer dismissed the health care practitioner, even if the duration of the noncompete is 1 year or less.

    Enforcement of contract provisions allowing employer recovery of reasonable expenses from the health care practitioner is permissible. The Act explicitly states it does not prohibit the enforcement of a provision allowing the employer to recover reasonable expenses from a health care practitioner if the expenses are

    • directly attributable to the health care practitioner and accrued within the 3 years prior to separation (unless separation is caused by employer dismissal of the health care practitioner);
    • related to relocation, training and establishment of a patient base; and
    • amortized over a period of up to 5 years from the health care practitioner’s date of separation.

    The Act also does not prohibit noncompete covenants entered into with a health care practitioner who has an interest in a business entity as a direct result of

    • the sale of an ownership interest or all or substantially all of the assets of the business entity;
    • a transaction resulting in the sale, transfer or other disposition of the control of the business entity, including by merger or consolidation; or
    • the health care practitioner’s receipt of an ownership interest in the business entity. Importantly, the health care practitioner must be a party to the sale, transfer, or other disposition; otherwise the preexisting noncompete covenant may be rendered void and unenforceable.

    The Act imposes patient notification requirements on the employer. Within 90 days of the health care practitioner’s departure, the employer must notify patients seen by the health care practitioner within the past year, who had an ongoing outpatient relationship with them for two or more years, of the following:

    • the health care practitioner’s departure;
    • how the patient may transfer the patient’s health records to a health care practitioner other than with the employer, if the patient chooses; and
    • that the patient may be assigned to a new health care practitioner within the existing employer, if the patient chooses to continue receiving care from the employer.

    The Act is silent regarding geographic restrictions on noncompete covenants. This is interesting, given that the Act explicitly highlights the concern for hospital noncompete covenants that stretch over broad geographic regions as part of the driving rationale. Additionally, it is unclear whether the Act applies to health care practitioners working as independent contractors. Notably, the FTC Final Rule does apply to independent contractors.

    The FTC Final Rule is facing numerous challenges, including ATS Tree Services LLC v. FTC, No. 24-cv-01743 (E.D. Pa.), which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. If the Final Rule is upheld, it will be interesting to see how it interplays with the Act. Regardless, the Act will take effect on Jan. 1, 2025, and will render any noncompete covenant entered into after this date (that does not qualify for a permitted exception) unenforceable. Pennsylvania health care practitioners (as defined by the Act) and employers must be mindful of the prohibition and restrictions set forth in the Act when drafting, entering into, renewing, and enforcing such provisions, and of the Dec. 31, 2024, deadline for entering new noncompete agreements that can be enforced.

    If you have any questions about the Act, the FTC Final Rule or any other legal matter, please email Sophia B. Villani, Esq., at sbvillani@norris-law.com or call her at (917) 369-8883.

    Associate
    Sophia B. Villani
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Third Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescriptions of Controlled Medications Expected Further Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescriptions of Controlled Medications The Evolution of AI in Healthcare: Current Trends and Legal Considerations

    Share

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more