This section provides a comprehensive explanation and evolution of basic immigration laws, including criminal and non-criminal bases for deportation from the United States.
This, by no means, includes every possible topic in immigration law and should not be construed as legal advice. This section solely deals with “typical” issues in immigration laws. You should consult an immigration attorney for a specific answer to a legal question.
Norris McLaughlin’s immigration attorneys are the leading immigration law and deportation defense team and is here in Allentown, Pennsylvania; Bridgewater and Montclair, New Jersey; and New York, New York; to discuss your specific case facts. Please know that every case is different and what follows is not to be construed as legal advice.
Immigration laws have evolved over the course of American and Global history. A primary purpose of United States immigration laws is to control the number and type of non-citizens who can be in the country. Among other things, these immigration laws outline conduct that can disqualify non-citizens from getting permission to enter or remain in the U.S. A key mechanism for enforcing the law against non-citizens already in the country is through their deportation. Under the law, one way such actions are justified is when the individual involved has been found to have committed various crimes.
For most of its history, the United States has maintained immigration laws to control which non-citizens are allowed to be in the country, for what reasons, for how long, and who can become citizens. The Alien Act of 1798, known as the Alien and Sedition Laws, empowered the President to expel any alien, or non-citizen, he deemed dangerous. A general immigration law passed in 1882 called for the exclusion of “idiots, lunatics, convicts, and persons likely to become public charges.” The 1882 law also banned Chinese immigrants. A 1917 immigration law established a literacy requirement for admission to the country.
In 1952 the McCarran-Walter Act established the basic structure of today’s immigration law, setting up deportation procedures, creating a quota system based on nationality, as well as detailed exclusions based on political grounds. Other major changes of the immigration laws have occurred in 1965, 1980, 1986, 1988, 1990, and 1996. Congress is again seriously debating major immigration revisions.
Congress creates immigration law and policy through statutes. The primary immigration laws are contained in a statute known as the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The INA and its related federal regulations (Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations) cover immigration laws governing:
The Department of Homeland Security is responsible for providing immigration-related services and benefits such as naturalization and work authorization as well as investigative and enforcement responsibilities for enforcement of federal immigration laws, customs laws, and air security laws.
Created in 2003 to replace the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, the USCIS is responsible for the administration of immigration and naturalization adjudication functions and establishing immigration services policies and priorities. These functions include:
Created in March 2003, ICE is the largest investigative branch of the DHS. The agency was created after September 11, 2001, by combining the law enforcement arms of the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the former U.S. Customs Service, to more effectively enforce immigration and customs laws and to protect the United States against terrorist attacks. ICE is the agency that has authority over detention and removal of aliens. It is also the agency that represents the government in immigration court.
A branch of the DHS, U.S. Customs and Border Protection is the single unified border and port of entry agency of the United States of America. The CBP joins together the Customs Inspector, the Immigration Inspector and the Agriculture Inspector at the nation’s points of entry — borders, airports, and seaports. The CBP seeks to facilitate the flow of legitimate trade and travel through points of entry into the U.S., while preventing terrorist and other criminal activity from entering the U.S.
The EOIR was created on January 9, 1983, through an internal Department of Justice (DOJ) reorganization, which combined the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) with the Immigration Judge function previously performed by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service. Besides establishing EOIR as a separate agency within DOJ, this reorganization made the Immigration Courts independent of INS (now the DHS), the agency charged with enforcement of federal immigration laws.
A bedrock rule of United States immigration laws is that they do not apply to US citizens whether they became citizens by virtue of being born here, born elsewhere to US citizen parents, or through the process of naturalization. Regardless of the manner of obtaining citizenship, citizens are not subject to deportation and other restrictions of our immigration laws.
This, of course, means that all non-citizens who are physically present in the country or who seek such immigration benefits as work and tourist visas and green cards or citizenship, are subject to these immigration laws. Violations of immigration laws entail the possibility of not being able to come to the USA or being forced to leave through a deportation process with the potential of never being able to return lawfully.
Non-citizens are subject to deportation regardless of their:
Deportation, of course, can mean severe hardships depending on the situation of the person being deported. For green card holders, deportation means being forced off the path to citizenship. For those without a green card, deportation means indefinite separation from family members, giving up roots and ties to the community, and significant financial hardships to themselves and to their family members. For some convicted of certain crimes, deportation means permanent banishment from the United States.
Immigration laws distinguish between those aliens who are “deportable” and those who are “inadmissible.” Deportable aliens are those aliens present in the United States but are subject to deportation for a violation of immigration laws of criminal laws of the United States.
On the other hand, inadmissible aliens are those aliens who are seeking entry into the United States (in the legal sense, for example, by applying for adjustment of status) but who are not admissible for various reasons, such as not being in possession of a valid visa or due to a previous criminal conviction.
Even people with green cards who commit a crime, then travel abroad and return, may be classified as “inadmissible” aliens, because upon their return, they would be applicants for admission to the United States and their previous conviction may make them “inadmissible.”
Different immigration laws apply to “deportable” and “inadmissible” aliens. Deportable aliens are subject to INA Section 237, whereas inadmissible aliens are subject to grounds of inadmissibility found at INA Section 212. There are certain grounds of deportability and inadmissibility for which an alien may be eligible for apply for a form of relief. However, not everyone qualifies for relief from being deported from the United States. Click here to learn more about the various forms of reliefs available to someone facing deportation or a ground of inadmissibility.
Deportation (also called “removal”) occurs when the federal government formally removes an alien from the United States for violations of a number of immigration or criminal laws. The immigration statute lists a number of types of activities that can make one “deportable.” The primary ones relate to immigration violations, national security and terrorism activities, and criminal violations.
Any alien that is in the United States may be subject to deportation or removal if he or she:
[This is not an exhaustive list of grounds of deportability. See INA § 237(a) for the exact language of all of the grounds of deportability]
The first problem created by these categories is that some of these broad categories are not straightforward and often require detailed analysis by an experienced immigration law professional to determine whether a person has violated any immigration laws.
A second problem is that certain keywords and phrases, such as “moral turpitude,” though generally referring to crimes involving dishonesty, immorality, or violence, are not defined in the immigration laws. As a result, the question of which criminal convictions involve an act of moral turpitude has been determined by court decisions and is very fact-specific. Analysis of these crimes is additionally complex because United States immigration law generally requires that crimes involving “moral turpitude” have been committed within five years of coming to the US and involve a potential sentence of at least one year (INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(i)).
So, in certain cases, not only must you decide whether a certain crime is one involving “moral turpitude,” but whether it was committed within five years of entry or later. Answers to these questions often determine whether someone is deportable but eligible for relief, or not deportable at all.
While an alien can be deported for a number of violations ranging from simple immigration violation to serious criminal convictions, the most serious and unforgiving ground of deportability is aggravated felony, found at INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii).
The definition of aggravated felony has changed over the years and promises to evolve as immigration laws get tougher and tougher.
Aliens convicted of an aggravated felony may be permanently barred from any relief from deportation, bond during immigration proceedings as a result of INA § 236(c), which subject aggravated felons to mandatory detention, and certain forms of judicial review.
Aggravated felony is defined in the immigration laws at INA § 101(a)(43).
The seriousness of being classified as an aggravated felon goes far beyond the stigma attached to such a label – it can mean permanent exile from the United States with no means of lawfully returning. Other consequences include:
Many other deportable offenses allow a non-citizen to be able to apply for “waivers” or exceptions to deportation. But no exceptions are available to aggravated felons.
Many persons with other violations, including some criminal violations that make them deportable, remain eligible to apply for asylum, lawful permanent residence (green card), and other routes to legal status spelled out in the INA if they meet other qualifications. Aggravated felons are disqualified from almost every provision of the law that would enable them to legalize their status or to retain existing legal status, such as a green card. Aliens convicted of aggravated felonies after November 29, 1990, are also permanently barred from becoming naturalized citizens, because under INA § 101(f), they are unable to show “good moral character.
Aggravated felons, in addition to several other types of non-citizens, fall within the INA’s “mandatory detention” provisions listed at INA § 236(c). This means that most aggravated felons will be detained until DHS is able to effect their deportation. The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of INA § 236(c).
For the most part, non-citizens can only be deported after an Immigration Judge conducts a hearing and signs an “order of removal (deportation).” However, the INA allows DHS to deport aggravated felons who are not green card holders “administratively,” that is, deport the aggravated felon under agency rules and regulations without having to take the case before an Immigration Judge to allow the alien to plead his or her case.
Aggravated felons are among a group of deportable non-citizens who have fewer legal rights to request a federal judge hear their case on appeal. However, they can still bring claims involving legal and constitutional issues.
Most non-citizens who are deported from the US are not eligible to apply to return legally to the country for a period of 5 to 20 years depending on their circumstances. But aggravated felons are permanently disqualified from ever returning to the US for any reason.
With the exception of an aggravated felony, the other most common ground for deportation is a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. While the INA does not define what constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude, generally, these crimes involve offenses related to dishonesty, theft, and morality.
Interestingly, unlike aggravated felony, which is only ground of deportability, a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude is both a ground of deportability (INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(i)) and ground of inadmissibility (INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I)). Thus, an alien present in the United States can be deported for such a conviction or an alien seeking admission in the United States can de denied admission on the basis of such a conviction.
As explained above, there is a legal difference between being deportable and being inadmissible. A green card holder, for example, can be inadmissible upon his or her return to the United States if he or she travels abroad after being convicted of a certain crime. However, like deportable aliens, inadmissible aliens may be eligible for relief in forms of discretionary waivers.
So who is inadmissible? The following classes of aliens are inadmissible and therefore ineligible to receive a visa or to be admitted into the United States:
Now that you are better acquainted with the basic immigration laws and may be able to see if any of these issues relate to you, contact us for more information. We are well-equipped to serve every immigration or deportation matter — regardless of how complex the situation presents itself.
Contact us today or call to schedule a Free Immigration Consultation in Allentown, Pennsylvania; Bridgewater or Montclair, New Jersey; or New York, New York. Call (484) 544-0022 or (888) 440-4872.