• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Banking Compliance Environmental Food, Beverage & Hospitality General Business Health Care In The News Insurance Labor & Employment Laws Legislation Patents Real Estate Regulatory Tax Trademarks Uncategorized
    Blogs > Legally Grown > NJ Medical Marijuana Law Limits...
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    NJ Medical Marijuana Law Limits Employer Drug Testing Practices

    NJ Medical Marijuana Law Limits Employer Drug Testing Practices

    Employers in New Jersey and New York City need to review their drug testing policies and employment practices considering laws recently enacted to protect employees (and applicants) who are authorized to use medical marijuana under state medical marijuana statutes.

    On July 2, 2019, New Jersey joined a handful of other states affording employment protections for job applicants and employees who are legally authorized medical marijuana patients.  The changes became effective immediately upon enactment.

    The July legislation, renamed the Jake Honig Compassionate Use Medical Cannabis Act (“CUMCA”), broadly expanded New Jersey’s medical marijuana program and added provisions that prohibit adverse employment actions against any employee or job applicant (such as refusal to hire, fire, or other discrimination against an employee) who is a registered qualifying patient, based “solely” on the employee’s status as a medical cannabis patient registered with the law’s newly created Cannabis Regulatory Commission.  The change to CUMCA also strictly regulates New Jersey employers’ drug testing procedures pertaining to employees and applicants, including a requirement to afford individuals who test positive for marijuana an opportunity to present a “legitimate medical explanation” for the positive result, or to have a retest of the original sample performed at the employee or applicant’s expense, before facing action by the employer.  Under CUMCA, as part of an employee's or applicant's explanation for a positive marijuana test result, the employee or applicant may present “an authorization for medical cannabis issued by a health care practitioner, proof of registration with the [Cannabis Regulatory] commission, or both.”  These new legislative protections partially address employees’ exposure to adverse employment actions that remained after Cotto v. Ardagh Glass Packing, Inc., a 2018 decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey holding that New Jersey employers were not required to waive a drug test as a condition of employment of authorized medical marijuana patients.

    There are important exceptions.  The changes to the law do not interfere with an employer’s right to take action relating to an employee’s possession or use of intoxicating substances during work hours or on the employer’s premises outside of work hours, or in accordance with federal law such as to maintain a federal contract or to comply with U.S. Department of Transportation regulations.

    In passing these protections for employees, New Jersey joins other states with similar (but not identical) anti-discrimination laws protecting authorized medical marijuana patients, including New York and Connecticut.  As we previously blogged, New York City also recently entered the cannabis-in-employment fray by generally prohibiting pre-employment THC screening, effective in May 2020.

    The new employment protections medical marijuana patients gained under CUMCA coincide with a separate pending review by the state’s Supreme Court of whether New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) requires employers to provide some level of a reasonable accommodation to disabled employees who treat their disabilities with legally prescribed medical marijuana.  The case, Wild v. Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc., was certified for review by the New Jersey Supreme Court on July 16, 2019, after the Appellate Division ruled that the employer may be required by the LAD to provide the former employee, a cancer patient, with a reasonable accommodation relating to his use of medical marijuana outside the workplace.  Needless to say, this case will be closely watched by stakeholders on all sides of this issue.

    If you have any questions regarding this post or any other related matters, please feel free to email me at cabruder@norris-law.com.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Share

    Tags

    #CUMCA #employment practices #medical marijuana law

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more