• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Copyright Copyright Infringement Copyright Licensing Copyright Office Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property|Social Media Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Social Media Copyright|Intellectual Property Copyright|Intellectual Property|Social Media|Trademarks Court Decisions Double Patenting>Same Invention Double Patenting>Terminal Disclaimers Drafting Patents Drafting Patents>Claims Drafting Patents>Claims>Written Description False Advertising Federal Circuit Food & Beverage Food & Beverage|Intellectual Property Food & Beverage|Labeling|Legislation Food & Beverage|Trade Dress Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademarks|Unfair Competition Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademarks General In The News Intellectual Property Labeling Lanham Act Legislation Licensing Navigating the Patent Office Navigating the Patent Office>Examiner Interviews Obviousness/Inventive Step>Prima Facie Obviousness Patent Patent Eligibility Privacy Right of Publicity Social Media Supreme Court Trade Dress Trademark Infringement Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademarks Trademark Office Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Office|Trademarks Trademark Registration Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Registration|TTAB Trademarks TTAB Uncategorized Unfair Competition
    Blogs > More Than Your Mark® > X/Twitter Claims Ownership of its...
    Associate
    Benjamin D. Schwartz
    Visit Profile

    X/Twitter Claims Ownership of its Social Media Accounts

    X/Twitter Claims Ownership of its Social Media Accounts

    Last month, X Corp., formerly and more famously known as Twitter (“X/Twitter”), filed a limited objection in the Texas federal court overseeing the bankruptcy case of Alex Jones involving the liquidation of his assets, including the right-wing “news” website Infowars. The underlying action involves, in part, the propriety of a bid awarded to the satirical news site The Onion for the purchase of certain Infowars assets. X/Twitter’s participation in the action was prompted by the proposed sale or other purported transfer of any Alex Jones or Infowars-associated accounts maintained on the X/Twitter platform.

    X/Twitter’s limited objection seeks to clarify and assert its ownership interests in all accounts maintained on its social media platform, including the ones controlled by Alex Jones and Infowars subject to the asset sale with The Onion. According to X/Twitter, its terms of service make clear that accounts on the social media platform are X/Twitter’s “exclusive property”. See X Terms of Service:

    “All right, title, and interest in and to the Services (excluding Content provided by users) are and will remain our and our licensors' exclusive property.”

    In contrast to X/Twitter’s claimed ownership of the accounts on its platform, X/Twitter squarely acknowledges that account holders or others own the content they submit, post, or display through the platform. But since X/Twitter claims it is the rightful owner of certain social media assets subject to the proposed asset sale, it argues that such portions of the sale or transfer cannot occur without X/Twitter’s consent (which it withholds).

    Other social media platforms rely on similar language in their terms of use, which are binding on all users, and which could reasonably be used as a basis for the platform to claim an ownership interest in any given account. For example:

    • Facebook: Facebook users are required to agree not to “transfer your account to anyone else (without [Facebook’s] permission)” and “may not sell, license, or purchase any data obtained from [Facebook] or [Facebook’s] services …”
    • Instagram: Instagram’s terms more explicitly state, “You can’t sell, license, or purchase any account or data obtained from [Instagram] or [Instagram’s] Service. This includes attempts to buy, sell, or transfer any aspect of your account (including your username); …” (emphasis added).
    • TikTok: TikTok’s terms state, “You may not: … distribute, license, transfer, or sell, in whole or in part, any of the Services or any derivative works thereof”.

    Despite this ownership position taken by social media companies, as set forth in their respective terms of use and even more explicitly in X/Twitter’s recent filing at the federal bankruptcy court in Texas, the fact remains that these types of social media asset transfers occur. Often included in the sale of a business or certain of its assets are social media accounts or “handles” that are packaged in the deal along with other more freely transferable brand assets like trademark registrations and domain names.

    According to X/Twitter, a sale or transfer of a social media account is null and void because the platform, rather than the individual user, is the rightful owner. Buyers beware. Even though these types of transfers may occur pursuant to private agreements, at least X/Twitter claims such transfers are in violation of its terms of use.

    If you have any questions about the ownership or transfers of social media assets, please feel free to contact me at bschwartz@norris-law.com.

    About the Author- More Than Your Mark

    Benjamin D. Schwartz is an associate in Norris McLaughlin, P.A.’s New York office, focusing on civil litigation and intellectual property matters. A registered patent attorney with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Ben has experience enforcing intellectual property rights, prosecuting trademarks, and counseling clients on trademark and patent protection. Before joining the firm, he worked for an intellectual property law firm in Silicon Valley, assisting with pre-trial procedures and legal research.

     

    Associate
    Benjamin D. Schwartz
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Liability of AI Platforms for Copyright Infringement: What Every Business Should Know Before Using Generative AI Lamar Jackson Successfully Opposes Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s Claim to No. 8 Who Owns a Vibe? Content Creators Battle Over Aesthetics of Social Media Posts

    Share

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more