MENU Close
Close
  • Home
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Resources
  • News & Events
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Join our Team
Search
Back
    Quick Links:
    Join Webinar
    Read News
    Our Location
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCriminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation, Employment, ERISA, and Employee Benefits
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media LawMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • About Us
    • Delivering Value
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Meritas

    New Jersey

    400 Crossing Boulevard
    8th Floor
    Bridgewater, NJ 08807
    Phone:(908) 722-0700
    Fax:(908) 722-0755

    28 Valley Road
    Suite 1
    Montclair, NJ 07042

    New York

    7 Times Square
    21st Floor
    New York City, NY 10036
    Phone:(212) 808-0700
    Fax:(212) 808-0844

    Pennsylvania

    515 West Hamilton Street
    Suite 502
    Allentown, PA 18101
    Phone:(610) 391-1800
    Fax:(610) 391-1805

    • What sets us apart
    • Attorneys
    • Other Professionals
    • Professional Development
    • Non-Discrimination Policy

    Categories

    Copyright Copyright Infringement Copyright Licensing Copyright Office Court Decisions Double Patenting>Same Invention Double Patenting>Terminal Disclaimers Drafting Patents Drafting Patents>Claims Drafting Patents>Claims>Written Description False Advertising Federal Circuit Food & Beverage General In The News Intellectual Property Labeling Lanham Act Legislation Licensing Navigating the Patent Office Navigating the Patent Office>Examiner Interviews Obviousness/Inventive Step>Prima Facie Obviousness Patent Patent Eligibility Privacy Right of Publicity Social Media Supreme Court Trade Dress Trademark Infringement Trademark Infringement|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademarks Trademark Office Trademark Registration Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademarks TTAB Uncategorized Unfair Competition
    Blogs > More Than Your Mark® > The Trademark Trial and Appeal...
    Norris McLaughlin, P.A.
    Visit Profile

    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Says “Yes, You Canna!” Register CANNABIS CANNIBALS for Entertainment Services

    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Says “Yes, You Canna!” Register CANNABIS CANNIBALS for Entertainment Services

    In In re Jeffrey Butscher, Serial No. 87572095, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) reversed the Examiner’s refusal to permit the trademark registration of the mark CANNABIS CANNIBALS for “entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring animated cannabis smoking cannibals provided through network or cable TV and the internet.”  According to the Applicant’s IMDb page, “Cannabis Cannibals stories the irreverent and comedic life of two weed smoking cannibals, who move to America in pursuit of becoming Reality TV Stars, while at the same time battling their unique eating disorder.”

    The Examiner asserted that the CANNABIS CANNIBALS mark merely describes the subject matter of the entertainment series, (i.e., cannabis smoking cannibals).  The Applicant admitted that the series features animated cannabis smoking cannibals.  However, the Applicant argued that the mark is suggestive, not descriptive, because viewers must use their imagination to understand the content and genre of the show.

    The TTAB applied the test for descriptiveness:  whether a mark “immediately conveys knowledge of a quality, feature, function, or characteristics of the goods or services with which it is used.”  If a mark is deemed to be descriptive, the TTAB determines whether the descriptive mark has acquired distinctiveness, thereby overcoming this basis of refusal.  Descriptiveness is determined in relation to the particular goods or services, the context in which it is being used, and the possible significance that the term has to an average consumer.  The TTAB further clarified that competitor use or need is not part of this inquiry.

    For a suggestive mark, the test is whether “one must exercise  mature thought or follow a multi-stage reasoning process in order to determine what product or service characteristics the term indicates.”

    In applying these tests, the TTAB determined that CANNABIS CANNIBALS is not merely descriptive, because the “primary significance of CANNABIS CANNIBALS to a prospective viewer indicates an ongoing entertainment series and the fanciful animated fictional, principal characters of the series.”  The TTAB further found that a descriptiveness finding in this case would “lead to an inequitable result that this Applicant, as well as countless other applicants in the creative industries, could not register their marks because the marks identify their characters or the subject matter of the televisions shows.”

    As an example, the TTAB cited registrations for the marks MORK & MINDY, THE LITTLE ENGINE, SUPERMAN, BATMAN, JOKER, and ROAD RUNNER as marks that identified fictional characters, yet still functioned as protectable trademarks.  The TTAB noted that other decisions where character marks were held to be merely descriptive were distinguishable because those marks were for historical figures or fictional public domain characters, such as MARTHA WASHINGTON or THE LITTLE MERMAID, where consumers do not typically associate a commercial entity as the source for these marks.

    The TTAB also found that the alliteration in the double use of the letter “C” further adds to the suggestive character of the mark.

    This decision is also notable because the TTAB rarely reverses an Examiner’s descriptiveness refusal.  In fact, about 90% of the time, the TTAB affirms the Examiner.

    If you have questions about trademark registration or any other trademark and/or cannabis issues related to your brand, please contact Danielle DeFilippis at dmdefilippis@norris-law.com or Jeanne Hamburg at jhamburg@norris-law.com.

    Norris McLaughlin, P.A.
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Around the World and Back Again: Tips for Global Brand Protection US Patent and Trademark Office Suspends Action on Trademarks Critical of Public Figures Hermés Wins on Metabirkins Cryptobags

    Share

    Tags

    #cannabis law #Descriptiveness #Entertainment Services Trademark #Examiner #trademark #Trademark Attorney #trademark law #Trademark Trial and Appeal Board #TTAB

    Similar Posts

    May 19, 2023
    Theft of Creative Content and Personality: A Practical Guide to Enforcing Rights when AI Steals Your Online and Social Media Content
    Theft of Creative Content and Personality: A Practical Guide to Enforcing Rights when AI Steals Your Online and Social Media Content
    March 10, 2023
    US Patent and Trademark Office Suspends Action on Trademarks Critical of Public Figures
    US Patent and Trademark Office Suspends Action on Trademarks Critical of Public Figures
    September 2, 2022
    Artificial Intelligence Cannot Serve as an Inventor of a Patentable Invention
    Artificial Intelligence Cannot Serve as an Inventor of a Patentable Invention

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more