• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    AI Anti-Trust/Trade Regulations Banking/Financial Services Business Operations Choice of Entity Compliance Construction Corporate Finance/Securities Corporate Governance Corporate Transparency Act Documentation Economic Development Law Entity Formation Franchise Law Franchises General Liquor Law Mergers & Acquisitions Public Utilities Real Estate Selling Your Business Tax Uncategorized
    Blogs > Biz Law Blog > ‘X-Rated’: SEC Sues Morningstar
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    ‘X-Rated’: SEC Sues Morningstar

    ‘X-Rated’: SEC Sues Morningstar

    On Tuesday, February 16, 2021, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a civil lawsuit in the U.S. Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York against Morningstar Credit Ratings LLC for “violating disclosure and internal controls provisions in rating commercial mortgage-backed securities (‘CMBS’).” Morningstar, Inc., is a diversified financial services firm founded in 1984, which went public in 2005. As it grew it added new financial services. In 2010, Morningstar, Inc., acquired Realpoint, LLC, which had been a privately-owned, nationally-recognized statistical rating organization. Realpoint was renamed Morningstar Credit Ratings LLC (“Morningstar”) and provides research and ratings of structured debt products, including mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities including CMBS, RMBS, and CLO’s. On May 29, 2019, Morningstar acquired Dominion Bond Rating Service of Toronto, Canada, to significantly expand both its rating services and its geographic reach. In October 2017, the Wall Street Journal published a front-page feature story criticizing Morningstar’s influence in rating these types of securities and questioning the predictive accuracy of its ratings systems.

    SEC Sues Morningstar

    Now the SEC has alleged, essentially, that the Wall Street Journal’s story was correct. The SEC’s complaint alleges that in 30 CMBS transactions totaling $30 billion, rated from 2015 to 2016, Morningstar permitted analysts to make undisclosed adjustments to key parts in the Morningstar model that it used to rate those securities. According to the complaint, the SEC alleges that the analyst eased the stress points in the rating model, which allowed Morningstar to reduce the amount of credit enhancements Morningstar required for the level of Morningstar rating. The SEC alleges that this benefitted the issuers of those securities by allowing those issuers to sell the securities with a lower rate of interest than they otherwise would have had to pay.

    The complaint also alleges that Morningstar failed to establish and enforce an effective internal control structure governing these undisclosed adjustments in a total of 31 transactions. The SEC’s February 16, 2021, Press Release includes a statement from Daniel Michael, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Complex Financial Instruments Unit:

    To increase transparency and guard against conflicts of interest, the Federal securities laws require credit rating agencies to disclose how ratings are determined and to have effective internal controls to ensure they adhere to their ratings methodologies. In this action, the complaint alleges that Morningstar failed on both counts by permitting analysts to make undisclosed adjustments over which Mornningstar had no effective internal controls.

    'X-Rated'

    Rating agencies like Morningstar can be a key to both the success and cost of any issuance of these complex securities. In response to the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, substantial new regulatory requirements concerning rating agencies were adopted. One of the abuses identified as facilitating the financial market collapse in the Great Recession was the inflated rating of Mortgage-Backed Securities, Collateralized Debt Obligations, and similarly structured securities. When the rater is corrupt, it is the investor who suffers.

    If you have any questions about this post or any other related securities or general business law matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys in our Business Law Group.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    When the “Back Door” is Closed: Muni Bond Underwriter Sanctioned “Oh, Baloney!” SEC Sues Father, Son, and Friend for Manipulating the Stock of a New Jersey Deli Who Pays and How Much? Consolidated Audit Trail Funding

    Share

    Tags

    #Adjustable Rate Mortgage #credit loss #SEC

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more