• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCriminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Branding General Business In the News Labelling Legislative Licensing Litigation Regulatory Social Uncategorized
    Blogs > Legal Liquor > PA Wineries to the PLCB:...
    Member
    Theodore J. Zeller III
    Visit Profile

    PA Wineries to the PLCB: Is it Legal to Offer Volume Discounts?

    PA Wineries to the PLCB: Is it Legal to Offer Volume Discounts?

    There have been rumblings around the Commonwealth that the Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (“LCE”) has been investigating Pennsylvania wineries regarding their selling practices. The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) has now addressed the issue in a Legal Advisory Opinion.

    In short, it has been a common business practice in Pennsylvania for wineries to offer volume discounts to consumers that purchase their products (i.e., percentage discount or a set price for purchasing a case of wine as opposed to one bottle of wine). The Legal Advisory Opinion was about whether a limited winery could offer a percentage discount if a consumer bought a certain number of bottles. The PLCB answered in the negative, stating that offering a discount on the purchase of multiple bottles of wine is illegal, under certain circumstances.

    The PLCB stated that it would be an illegal inducement under the Pennsylvania Liquor Code to offer or advertise a discount based upon the amount of wine purchased. Essentially, if a winery is advertising 25% off the total cost if you purchase a case of wine, that would be an illegal inducement under the Pennsylvania Liquor Code. However, there is another way to provide volume discounts to your consumers, thereby increasing your consumer sales (which is what we should be advocating that small businesses do in Pennsylvania).

    You can provide discounts based upon the amount of wine purchased if that is the regular price for that quantity of wine. That means you cannot market or advertise it as a discount, and it will be up to your consumers to figure out that purchasing a case of wine will be cheaper per bottle than purchasing one bottle, so long as the discounting is “proportional.” There is no definition in the Pennsylvania Liquor Code for “proportional,” but Merriam Webster defines it as “having a direct relationship to something in size, number, or amount.” While that does not exactly clarify the Legal Advisory Opinion, I believe it is safe to assume that set pricing structure as discussed below would be “proportional.” For example:

    Two Pennsylvania wineries are selling their award-winning Pinot Grigios; one is offering discounts legally and the other is not.

    • Winery 1 is currently charging $30 per bottle, and advertising that it will give you a 25% discount if you purchase a case of the Pinot Grigio. That would work out to a $90 discount if you purchased a case (12 bottles) of the Winery 1 Pinot Grigio. Unfortunately, this discounting practice would be an illegal inducement under the Pennsylvania Liquor Code
    • Winery 2 is charging $30 per bottle like its competitor, Winery 1, but having read this blog, Winery 2 knows that it can offer fixed volume pricing for its wine. Instead of advertising a 25% discount like Winery 1 and risking a citation from LCE, Winery 2 has determined that the same discount can be achieved legally by selling a case of its Pinot Grigio for $270. Winery 2 does not advertise it as a discount; it simply advertises its fixed pricing for bulk wine of each of its brands. This would not be an illegal inducement under the Pennsylvania Liquor Code.

    Clearly, then, the same ultimate discount can be legal so long as you advertise your discounts as fixed prices instead of percentage discounts. Absent a finding by LCE that the discount is not “proportional” as used in the Legal Advisory Opinion, the discount pricing by Winery 2 should comply with the recent Legal Advisory Opinion from the PLCB. Although it may not be as eye-catching to your consumers as a percentage discount, the risk of illegal advertising is never worth getting a citation or lengthy investigation from LCE.

    For information regarding national and state liquor law matters or general manufacturing and distribution advice, please contact our Liquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and Distribution Practice Group: Liquor Law Department Chair Theodore J. Zeller III, Esquire (tzeller@norris-law.com); David C. Berger, Esquire (dberger@norris-law.com) for Pennsylvania and New Jersey retail and manufacturing licensing; or contact our offices at 610-391-1800.

    Member
    Theodore J. Zeller III
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Planes, Trains, and Shopping Carts: Permissible Vehicles for Transporter-for-Hire Licensees Higher Prices in Pennsylvania and Liquor Law Reform in New Jersey Crafting a Solution: New Jersey Lawmaker Takes Steps to Roll Back New Brewery Restrictions

    Share

    Tags

    #liquor law #Pennsylvania winery laws #PLCB

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more