• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Citizenship Crime DACA Deportation Detention DREAM Act EB-5 Education Elections Employers General Immigration Government Green Card Hot Topics ICE LGBTQ+ Refugees Social Media Sponsorship Uncategorized Undocumented USCIS Visas
    Blogs > Immigration Matters > New York-Based Pharmaceutical Company Slapped...
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    New York-Based Pharmaceutical Company Slapped with $220,000 Civil Penalty for Discriminatory Hiring Practices

    New York-Based Pharmaceutical Company Slapped with $220,000 Civil Penalty for Discriminatory Hiring Practices

    On May 26, 2021, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that after investigation, it had reached a settlement with LNK International, Inc. (LNK), a New York-based company that manufactures over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, regarding discriminatory hiring practices. This settlement was reached to resolve the DOJ’s claim that LNK violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by discriminating against work-authorized non-U.S. citizens.

    “Employers cannot discriminate against employees because of their citizenship status, immigration status, or national origin when verifying that employees are authorized to work in the United States,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department looks forward to working with LNK to ensure its compliance with the INA’s anti-discrimination provision so that all employees are subject to the same rules for proving their ability to work in the United States.”

    DOJ’s Investigation on LNK’s Discriminatory Hiring

    The investigation revealed that LNK routinely requested certain specific documents from lawful permanent residents as proof of authorization to work in the U.S. The investigation determined that LNK required employees with lawful permanent residence status to show their card as proof of ability to work, whereas they gave the U.S. citizens a whole list of acceptable documents to choose from. LNK also had an unlawful policy of requiring refugees and asylees with valid work authorization to show their work authorization documents from time to time, even though the non-citizens had already established their ongoing authorizations.

    The Settlement

    Under the terms of the settlement, LNK will pay the department $220,000 as a civil penalty. Further, LNK will train its employees on the INA’s anti-discrimination provision and provide extensive training in the Immigrant and Employee Rights (IER) Section. LNK will also be subject to a three-year timeframe to comply with the settlement agreement.

    The Civil Rights Division’s IER is the authority responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provision in the INA. The statute prohibits discrimination in nature - discrimination based on citizenship status, national origin discrimination in hiring, firing, recruitment or referral for a fee, unfair documentary process, retaliation, and intimidation.

    Work Authorization for Non-Citizens in the United States

    Several categories of non-citizens have the authorization to work legally in the U.S. These non-citizen categories include legal permanent residents, refugees, asylees, non-citizens with work visas, dependents of certain non-citizens, etc. According to federal law, citizens and non-citizens alike can choose from among a list of documents to prove that they are legally authorized to work in the U.S. The INA’s anti-discrimination policies prohibit employers from discriminating against non-citizen employees.

    To learn more about this blog post or if you have any other immigration concerns, please feel free to contact me at info@norris-law.com or (484) 544-0022.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    DOJ Settles Immigration Discrimination Claim Against Washington Home Care Provider DOJ Announces Settlement of Immigration-Related Discrimination Claims with Insurance Company DOJ Announces Settlement of Immigration-Related Discrimination Claims Against Frozen Food Company

    Share

    Tags

    #discrimination #employment authorization document #non-citizen

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more