• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Citizenship Crime DACA Deportation Detention DREAM Act EB-5 Education Elections Employers General Immigration Government Green Card Hot Topics ICE LGBTQ+ Refugees Social Media Sponsorship Uncategorized Undocumented USCIS Visas
    Blogs > Immigration Matters > ICE Investigators Use Private Database...
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    ICE Investigators Use Private Database Covering Millions of Individuals to Pursue Immigration Violations

    ICE Investigators Use Private Database Covering Millions of Individuals to Pursue Immigration Violations

    According to Georgetown Law researchers, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have bought private data containing millions of individuals’ phone, water, electricity, and other utility records. ICE will use these records to pursue immigration violations. ICE’s use of this private data shows how government agencies exploit commercial data to gain access to information that they are not to compile themselves.

    The Private Database

    CLEAR, a database company owned by Thomson Reuters, sells “legal investigation software solutions” to a broad range of companies and public agencies. The data includes more than 400 million names, addresses, and service records from more than 80 utility companies. This data covers information from all the basic utilities such as water, gas and electricity, phone, and internet and cable TV.

    According to CLEAR, their database, which is updated daily contains billions of records related to people’s employment, housing, credit reports, criminal histories, and vehicle registrations from utility companies in all the states and territories of the U.S. It gathers credit reporting data from Equifax.

    Though Thomson Reuters did not provide a list of its clientele, its marketing documents show its data has been used by a police department in Detroit, a credit union in California, and a fraud investigator in the Midwest. Additionally, federal purchasing records show that the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Defense are among the federal agencies that use CLEAR.

    Federal Agencies’ Use of Private Data is Under Review

    The House Committee on Oversight and Reform, led by Rep. Jimmy-Gomez (D-CA) and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), wrote letters to the chief executives of Thomson Reuters and Equifax, seeking documents on how ICE used the documents obtained from these data companies in the recent years. “We are concerned that Thomson Reuters’ commercialization of personal and use data of utility customers and sale of broad access to ICE is an abuse of privacy, and that ICE’s use of this database is an abuse of power,” wrote the Representatives.

    Thomson Reuters directed the letters to ICE, which declined to comment, citing law enforcement sensitivities. Equifax did not respond to the comments. But records reveal that ICE has been using this data since last year. In a Freedom of Information Act response to Georgetown Law Center, ICE noted in July 2020 that it was using information from the public database to investigate individuals who are overstaying. ICE also monitors information that a target has recently departed from their address.

    Nina Wang, a policy associate at the Georgetown Law Center, said the database enabled ICE to pursue undocumented immigrants who refrain from getting a driver’s license, but whose data nonetheless falls prey when they pay for utilities and other essentials of life. “There needs to be a line drawn in defense of people’s basic dignity. And when the fear of deportation could endanger their ability to access these basic services, that line is being crossed,” Wang said. “It’s a massive betrayal of people’s trust. … When you sign up for electricity, you don’t expect them to send immigration agents to your front door.”

    Will ICE Continue to Use Private Data?

    ICE’s subscription with Thomson Reuters, which was a $21 million contract, has expired. ICE is setting up a new solicitation for a “Law Enforcement Investigative Database,” but it remains to be seen whether the Biden administration will approve such a contract.

    Federal agencies are subject to regulations concerning access to an individual’s personal information. The Privacy Act of 1974 governs that access; however, the Act does not cover CLEAR or other private database use by federal agencies. Federal agencies have relied on this private data, which they are not allowed to collect without a court order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials have used data from cellphone locations, obtained without warrants, to track people inside the country. Though the data is not to be used by the agents, they claim that the individuals have been granted access to it through weather and gaming apps.

    To learn more about this blog post or if you have any other immigration concerns, please feel free to contact me at info@norris-law.com or (484) 544-0022.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Immigration Enforcement Protocol Accused Attacker of Paul Pelosi Present in the United States Illegally; Faces Deportation DOJ Settles Immigration Discrimination Claim Against Maryland Company

    Share

    Tags

    #Customs and Border Patrol #Department of Justice #Homeland Security

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more