• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Citizenship Crime DACA Deportation Detention DREAM Act EB-5 Education Elections Employers General Immigration Government Green Card Hot Topics ICE LGBTQ+ Refugees Social Media Sponsorship Uncategorized Undocumented USCIS Visas
    Blogs > Immigration Matters > Massachusetts Contractor Retaliated Against Injured...
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Massachusetts Contractor Retaliated Against Injured Immigrant Worker; Jury Awards $650K in Damages

    Massachusetts Contractor Retaliated Against Injured Immigrant Worker; Jury Awards $650K in Damages

    A federal jury in the District of Massachusetts recently found that a Massachusetts-based contractor unlawfully retaliated against an immigrant employee following a work injury, resulting in the employee’s detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). The jury awarded the employee $50,000 in compensatory damages and $600,000 in punitive damages, highlighting the severe consequences for workplace retaliation. 

    Allegations of Retaliation Against Employee

    According to a complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on February 27, 2019, an immigrant employee suffered a work injury when he fell from a ladder in March of 2017.  After the injury was reported to his employer, the employee reported the incident to the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”). 

    Following the report of safety concerns, the employer initiated an immigration investigation that led to the employee’s detainment by ICE. Based on text message and phone records, the employer arranged for ICE officers to meet the employee at the employer’s place of business, and the employer did not object to the employee’s arrest at that location. A subsequent investigation by OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program concluded that the employer’s actions constituted retaliation against the employee and was therefore unlawful. 

    Under U.S. Labor Law, reports giving rise to OSHA proceedings are protected activities under Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), which prohibits retaliation against employees for reporting workplace violations. The OSH Act prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who exercise their rights under the Act, regardless of the employee’s immigration status. The OSH Act provides safe and healthy workplaces for workers in the United States, and OSHA acts to ensure that workplace conditions in this country remain safe for all workers. 

    Jury Awards Substantial Verdict Against Employer

    The lawsuit against the employer went to trial and was recently decided by a jury, which awarded the employee $50,000 in compensatory damages and $600,000 in punitive damages.  Specifically, the jury assessed $200,000 in punitive damages against the employer’s company and $400,000 against the individual employer who reported the employee to ICE. According to Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda, “[t]he Department of Labor will not tolerate retaliation against employees who complain of workplace abuses, including when an employer seeks to use an employee’s perceived immigration status as a way to intimidate workers. Successful enforcement of worker protection laws depends on workers being empowered and feeling safe enough to speak out for themselves and their fellow workers. If workers are brave enough to come forward, we will use all legal tools we have to protect them.”

    Verdict Highlights Rights of Immigrant Workers to Report Workplace Violations

    The verdict sends a strong message to employers who seek retaliation against employees who exercise their rights under the law. Further, the verdict highlights that an employee’s immigration status has no bearing on their ability to exercise their rights under labor law to report workplace violations in the United States.

    To learn more about this blog post, or if you have any other immigration concerns, please feel free to contact me at info@norris-law.com or (484) 544-0022.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Amid Tech Layoffs, Demand for H-1B Visas Reaches New Highs Butler County Takes a Stand: Reverses Sanctuary Policy to Improve Public Safety Good News for American Businesses: H1-B Denial Rates Plummet Under Biden Write

    Share

    Tags

    #immigration #Immigration Law

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more