• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
  • Join Our Team
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Banking Compliance Environmental Food, Beverage & Hospitality General Business Health Care In The News Insurance Labor & Employment Laws Legislation Patents Real Estate Regulatory Tax Trademarks Uncategorized
    Blogs > Legally Grown > Delta’s Rough Waters: Attorneys General...
    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Delta’s Rough Waters: Attorneys General Call for Regulation of ‘Intoxicating Hemp Products’

    On Wednesday, March 20, 2024, a bipartisan coalition of 21 attorneys general from across the United States took the significant step of urging Congress to tackle what they describe as a “health and safety crisis” precipitated by the 2018 Farm Bill’s proliferation of “intoxicating hemp products.” This request was contained in a letter dispatched that day to the heads of the agriculture committees of both congressional chambers including Chair Glenn Thompson, Chair Debbie Stabenow, and Ranking Members David Scott, and John Boozman. The attorneys general pointed to the 2018 federal Farm Bill, which by legalizing low-THC hemp nationwide, legalized certain hemp-derived intoxicating products that closely mimic the psychoactive effects of cannabis.

    The crux of the issue lies in the 2018 Farm Bill’s definition of legally permissible "hemp," which is based solely on its concentration of Delta-9-THC, the primary psychoactive compound in cannabis, while neglecting other THC isomers such as Delta-8 THC and Delta-10 THC. This has led to a burgeoning market, estimated at a staggering $28 billion, where cannabis-equivalent products freely circulate, irrespective of individual states' decisions on cannabis legalization. The attorneys general argue these products pose a substantial risk to their citizens by potentially subverting regulations and consumer protections in jurisdictions where adult-use legal cannabis programs are firmly established.

    Despite the diverse group of signatories, led by Republican attorneys general Todd Rokita (R-IN) and Tim Griffin (R-AR), and including Democratic counterparts Michelle Henry (D-PA) and Keith Ellison (D-MN), the letter troublingly refrains from suggesting explicit policy remedies. This initiative follows closely on the heels of a formal legal opinion issued by Arizona’s Democratic attorney general, Kris Mayes—who notably did not sign the Wednesday letter—stating that unauthorized retailers cannot lawfully vend intoxicating products derived from hemp despite federal permission from the 2018 Farm Bill.

    State responses to hemp-derived intoxicating products vary widely. Some, like Oregon and Colorado, where recreational marijuana is legal, have sought to outright ban substances such as Delta-8, while others, including Michigan, Minnesota, and Maryland, aim to incorporate them into their adult-use cannabis regulatory frameworks. In states where cannabis remains illegal, approaches to Delta-8 THC diverge significantly, with Arkansas facing federal court injunctions against its ban, and Kentucky and Tennessee allowing the legal sale of such products to adults over 21. And states like Pennsylvania and New Jersey have adopted a laissez-faire stance, neither effectively regulating nor banning these intoxicating hemp products.

    It is evident that a more uniform and pragmatic approach toward regulating intoxicating hemp products is an urgent need, akin to the regulatory frameworks established for alcohol. This would entail restricting sales to minors, establishing rigorous standards for product manufacturing and production, and mandating comprehensive labeling that clearly specifies the dosage and contents of these products. By proactively implementing these measures, states like New Jersey and Pennsylvania could pioneer a sensible regulatory scheme that ensures public safety and consumer protection without federal intervention. As the 2024 Farm Bill looms on the horizon, it is imperative for these states to leverage this window of opportunity to establish a robust regulatory framework that could serve as a model for others, thereby preempting the risks associated with the current regulatory vacuum and setting a precedent for responsible governance in this rapidly evolving sector.

    For information about national and state cannabis law matters and regulatory compliance, please contact our Cannabis Law Practice Group attorneys: William J. Beneduce, Esquire (wjbeneduce@norris-law.com) for New Jersey Cannabis matters or contact our offices at (908)722-0700.

    NM PR
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds That CBD Products Can Be Reimbursable Medical Expenses Under Workers’ Compensation NJ’s Mixed Smoke Signals: Cracking Down on Hemp but Stalling on Cannabis Lounges Holy Hemp: New Jersey Court Partially Invalidates Hemp Law

    Share

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join Our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more