• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Copyright Copyright Infringement Copyright Licensing Copyright Office Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property|Social Media Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Social Media Copyright|Intellectual Property Copyright|Intellectual Property|Social Media|Trademarks Court Decisions Double Patenting>Same Invention Double Patenting>Terminal Disclaimers Drafting Patents Drafting Patents>Claims Drafting Patents>Claims>Written Description False Advertising Federal Circuit Food & Beverage Food & Beverage|Intellectual Property Food & Beverage|Labeling|Legislation Food & Beverage|Trade Dress Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademarks|Unfair Competition Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademarks General In The News Intellectual Property Labeling Lanham Act Legislation Licensing Navigating the Patent Office Navigating the Patent Office>Examiner Interviews Obviousness/Inventive Step>Prima Facie Obviousness Patent Patent Eligibility Privacy Right of Publicity Social Media Supreme Court Trade Dress Trademark Infringement Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademarks Trademark Office Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Office|Trademarks Trademark Registration Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Registration|TTAB Trademarks TTAB Uncategorized Unfair Competition
    Blogs > More Than Your Mark® > Tokenizing Creative Works: Dash, Jay-Z,...
    Member
    Jeanne Hamburg
    Visit Profile

    Tokenizing Creative Works: Dash, Jay-Z, and A Lesson in Copyright

    Tokenizing Creative Works: Dash, Jay-Z, and A Lesson in Copyright

    In March 2021, Artnet News reported that Beeple’s $69 million sale of a non-fungible token (“NFT”) artwork at Christie’s was the highest on record to date. For those who hadn’t been paying attention, the sale was a head-turning event.

    Dash, Jay-Z, and A Lesson in Copyright

    NFTs are digital assets on the blockchain with unique identification codes and metadata that distinguish them from each other. NFTs can be used to represent real-world tangible assets such as creative works. But when NFTs represent original creative works, can just anyone tokenize them? The answer is a resounding no.

    A federal lawsuit filed on June 18, 2021, pits Roc-A-Fella Records, Inc., (“RAF”) against Damon Dash. RAF is owned in equal parts by Shawn Carter, a/k/a Jay-Z, Kareem Burke, and Dash. On June 23, the Court entered a temporary restraining order enjoining Dash from selling an NFT of Jay-Z’s Reasonable Doubt album. Dash claimed to be selling his one-third interest in RAF via the NFT sale. And here’s where Dash got it wrong. Simply because he owned a one-third interest in RAF does not mean Dash owned a joint interest in the copyright in the master recordings comprising the Reasonable Doubt album.

    Rather, the 1995 master recording agreement between Jay-Z and RAF clearly specifies that RAF commissioned the master recordings for Reasonable Doubt as works made for hire, with copyright ownership and authorship in the name of the commissioning party, RAF, according to the Complaint in the case. Therefore, copyright in the masters is owned by RAF, not by one or more of its individual owners.

    Tokenizing Creative Works

    Dash’s mistake was in failing to understand that he could not tokenize a creative work protected under the copyright law if he were not the owner of copyright in the work. The lesson: be aware of the copyright status of creative works before you attempt to exploit them by tokenizing them and selling them as an NFT. If you are not aware, you just may end up in court.

    For further guidance on copyright issues or disputes, or any other intellectual property matter, please don’t hesitate to contact me at jhamburg@norris-law.com.

    Member
    Jeanne Hamburg
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Terminate Copyright Grants Correctly or Risk Losing Your Rights

    Share

    Tags

    #artwork #entertainment #Tokenizing

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more