• Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • Online Payment
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology can be found here.
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Media & Insights
  • About Us
  • Delivering Value
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Meritas
  • Contact Us
  • Online Payment
    A
    Alternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust & Trade RegulationAppellate Practice
    B
    Banking & Financial ServicesBankruptcy, Creditors’ Rights, and Financial RestructuringBeer LawBusiness Law
    C
    Cannabis LawConstruction LawCooperative and Condominium Law (Co-op & Condo)Criminal Defense
    E
    Economic Development LawElder Care & Special Needs LawElectronic Discovery ("E-Discovery")Environmental LawERISA & Employee BenefitsEstate Planning and Administration & Wealth PreservationExecutive Compensation and Employment Strategies
    F
    Food, Beverage & HospitalityFranchise Law
    H
    Health Care & Life SciencesHealth Care ProvidersHigher EducationHospitals and Health Networks
    I
    ImmigrationInsurance CoverageIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration, and Dispute ResolutionIntellectual Property Portfolio Strategy, Management & LicensingInternational BusinessInternet Law
    L
    Labor & EmploymentLiquor Law, Licensing, Manufacturing, and DistributionLitigation
    M
    Media Law & Creative Economy PracticeMergers & AcquisitionsMunicipal Law
    N
    Non-Profit Law
    P
    Patent Preparation and ProsecutionPharmaceutical / Medical Devices / Pharma ServicesProducts and Consumer Liability DefenseProfessional LiabilityPublic Utilities
    R
    Real Estate, Finance, and Land Use
    S
    SecuritiesSolar Energy
    T
    TaxationTelecommunicationsTrademark & Copyright Protection & Enforcement
    V
    Venture Tech & Emerging Growth Companies
    W
    White Collar Investigations & DefenseWorkers’ Compensation
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Pennsylvania
    • Blogs
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Resources

    Categories

    Copyright Copyright Infringement Copyright Licensing Copyright Office Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Intellectual Property|Social Media Copyright|Copyright Infringement|Social Media Copyright|Intellectual Property Copyright|Intellectual Property|Social Media|Trademarks Court Decisions Double Patenting>Same Invention Double Patenting>Terminal Disclaimers Drafting Patents Drafting Patents>Claims Drafting Patents>Claims>Written Description False Advertising Federal Circuit Food & Beverage Food & Beverage|Intellectual Property Food & Beverage|Labeling|Legislation Food & Beverage|Trade Dress Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Infringement|Trademarks|Unfair Competition Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademark Office|Trademarks|TTAB Food & Beverage|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Food & Beverage|Trademarks General In The News Intellectual Property Labeling Lanham Act Legislation Licensing Navigating the Patent Office Navigating the Patent Office>Examiner Interviews Obviousness/Inventive Step>Prima Facie Obviousness Patent Patent Eligibility Privacy Right of Publicity Social Media Supreme Court Trade Dress Trademark Infringement Trademark Infringement|Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Infringement|Trademarks Trademark Office Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Office|Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Office|Trademarks Trademark Registration Trademark Registration|Trademarks Trademark Registration|Trademarks|TTAB Trademark Registration|TTAB Trademarks TTAB Uncategorized Unfair Competition
    Blogs > More Than Your Mark® > Creator Dedicates Award-Winning Comics Series...
    Member
    David H. Siegel
    Visit Profile

    Creator Dedicates Award-Winning Comics Series to the Public Domain – Or Does He?

    Creator Dedicates Award-Winning Comics Series to the Public Domain – Or Does He?

    Originally published from 2002 through 2015, the comic book series Fables tells the stories of fairy-tale characters living in modern New York City. Winner of more than 20 Eisner Awards (the equivalent of the Academy Awards or Emmys for comics), it was widely considered one of the best comics of the 2000s. Since the end of its first run, Fables has produced spin-offs, video games, and multiple canceled film and television projects. In 2022, for Fables’ 20th anniversary, DC Comics and creator Bill Willingham launched a direct continuation under the title Fables: The Black Forest. However, Willingham has taken a surprising step due to ongoing disputes with the publisher.

    On Sept. 14, 2023, Willingham announced that, effective the next day, Fables would be in the public domain, stating in a blog post:

    As of now, 15 September 2023, the comic book property called Fables, including all related Fables spin-offs and characters, is now in the public domain. What was once wholly owned by Bill Willingham is now owned by everyone, for all time. It’s done, and as most experts will tell you, once done it cannot be undone. Take-backs are neither contemplated nor possible.

    Willingham’s act can be called a dedication to the public domain or a waiver or abandonment of his copyright. Surprisingly, the Copyright Act and related statutes do not address such voluntary surrenders of copyright, and the law regarding the form and effect of such dedications or abandonments is unclear – neither the Copyright Office nor the Courts define standard language or acts that make an intended release effective and irrevocable. Willingham’s statement makes particularly clear that it is a deliberate dedication to the public domain and that he intends it to be irrevocable, but other issues remain. He can dedicate to the public domain only the copyrights he owns, and even those may be limited by agreements with his publishers or co-creators.

    In his blog post, Willingham does not conceal that he is subject to certain agreements with DC Comics that restrict his ability to publish Fables works or authorize others to make derivative works or merchandise. Those same agreements may restrict his ability to abandon his copyrights in this manner, and further, while Fables is often called a “creator-owned” series, and Willingham describes it using that term, it is not clear exactly what Willingham owns – while he wrote the series, the artists were employed by DC Comics, and even his contributions may still be owned by DC Comics. For example, the copyright registration for the first collected Fables volume, Reg. No. TX0005428291, reflects DC Comics as the sole copyright claimant and owner. While it is possible that his agreements with DC Comics assigned back his work (or even the illustrations that accompanied them), it is very likely that Willingham owns only the copyright in the characters and setting, which are closely modeled on existing public domain materials such as Cinderella, the Big Bad Wolf, and the like.

    Whether viewed as a noble release of rights to the public good or a petty tactic in a contractual dispute, it appears that Willingham has released his copyrights into the public domain. However, he can only release his copyrights, and DC Comics is disputing his ownership of all aspects of the Fables comic books, including their “storylines, characters, and elements.” This dispute means that a creator using elements taken from Fables would be taking a significant risk that DC Comics (a subsidiary of Warner Bros Discovery) would take action against infringement of their copyrights in Fables. It is very possible that Willingham’s dedication to the public domain will be of little or no effect, as it is impossible to know, without reviewing every past agreement between Willingham and DC Comics, which of DC Comics and Willingham owned the copyright in each element of Fables when Willingham made his announcement.

    Like with every other copyright matter, clearance and legal review are vital to avoid copyright infringement. If you have any questions or concerns pertaining to publishing, public domain, or copyright, please do not hesitate to reach out to me at dsiegel@norris-law.com

    Member
    David H. Siegel
    Visit Profile

    Related Posts

    Lamar Jackson Successfully Opposes Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s Claim to No. 8 Who Owns a Vibe? Content Creators Battle Over Aesthetics of Social Media Posts You ® Mine: Valentine’s Day Trademarks & Trade Dresses

    Share

    Helpful links

    • About Us
    • News
    • Services
    • Blogs
    • Attorneys
    • Articles
    • (COVID-19)
    • Award Methodology
    • Events
    • Join our Team
    Connect
    Online Payment

    Connect with Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    Join our growing team

    We are looking for quality attorneys to help us do more for our clients. At Norris McLaughlin, each attorney has the same opportunity to succeed whether you’re at the beginning of a career or pinnacle of the profession.

    Learn More

    Subscribe to our content

    Receive timely legal information delivered to your inbox

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    © , Norris McLaughlin, P.A., All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
    VIEW OUR DISCLAIMER,  TERMS OF USE,  AND PRIVACY POLICY

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume you consent to our cookie policy. Learn more